Winning the awards — Somebody tell me how it’s done
Movie critics, who do nothing but watch and rate movies all day, can’t even predict what will happen with Oscar nominations. How am I to know what kinds of articles trade press judges are going to like? Without knowing an industry, how can you judge how valuable new information is to an audience? And the comparison between industries seems a little apples to oranges to me.
What wins? Humor? Levity? Hard-hitting news? Analysis? I still haven’t figured it out. I have to win something sooner or later. Anyone have any advice for me? My ego is aching.
John Brady – Rebel Without A Contents Page
Other things I wouldn’t mind seeing go away:
- Advertiser index. I just don’t think that’s how readers use magazines. Am I wrong?
- Reader service numbers. Are we the only ones who still use them? If a reader wants more information, they’ll either go to our website or Google.
- The upfront news section. You’ve already heard it by the time the magazine hits your desk. I can just about guarantee it. If we need to elaborate, it should be a feature.
- Every ad’s request for far forward, right hand page. C’mon. Really?
- Cover blurbs. I know they’re important. I just can’t write them.
- The four-column page. Every line is hyphenated and I think for regular features it looks bad overall. It can sometimes work for special features/sections, though.
Update Your Image…Golf Digest Did It For Golf
Golf – it is the downfall of my career. I hate it, so I’ll never be an executive. I’ve made my peace with it.
But I accidentally came across an issue of Golf Digest today. I wasn’t reading it, I was checking to see what they do with their back page and TOC. And it was rockin. The design is really clean, with sharp, modern-looking tabheads and graphics. Mr. Style’s take on the year in golf, with Borat! It reads like Men’s Health.
So why are broadcasts of golf matches (games, rounds, whatever) still so boring? Lame elevator music playing in and out of commercials? Tired graphics….etc.
Are trade magazines the golf broadcasts of publishing? People who read Men’s Health and Golf Digest also read our magazines. But, in my experience, we don’t feel we can compete. Why not? Because we’re not on the newsstand? I’ve heard the comment many times that we don’t want to look “too commercial.” Why not? What does commercial mean, anyway? Does it mean it has an attractive cover concept? That seems pretty important to any magazine. If it’s not on a newsstand, it’s on a desk with 50 other trade magazines. Just not on a rack.
Won’t learn the Web? You’re fired.
“I personally don’t like working with people who get paid a lot and do very little,” he is quoted in the newsletter. “Promote your superstar editors and fire the rest.” Actually, I guess it’s not so much hilarious as sad. I think we all see this problem sometimes.
I like the culture change Howard Owens is quoted talking about on Poynter Online:
“Reporters and editors would take seriously their roles as community conversation leaders, concentrating on getting it right on the web first — Web-first publishing, blogs, video, participation — and using the print edition as a greatest hits, promote the web site vehicle. Old packaged-goods-thinking about the newsPAPER would disappear overnight.”
This is a huge change and I’m sure a lot of people out there don’t want to do the homework. Editors need to experiment to find out how things work. And I think it’s critical that they use at least Web basics in their own lives.
So to expand on Jeremy’s thought, here’s my list of things every editor should know how to do to avoid being fired:
- Use an RSS reader
- Blog
- Get stuff posted on your magazine’s Web site, whether you do it personally or not
- Take a picture with your camera phone
- Send a text message
- Set up Google Alerts
- Send a meeting request in Outlook
Have any to add?