<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Trade Pressed</title>
	<link>http://tradepressed.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Twitter really for?</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/08/07/whats-twitter-really-for/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/08/07/whats-twitter-really-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/2008/08/07/whats-twitter-really-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been to the conferences and I know what the (current) Web 2.0 tools are. The obvious ones. And I agree. We should be using these tools. But how? Standing up in front of a bunch of editors and saying &#8220;Twitter,&#8221; like it&#8217;s completely self-explanatory, is just going to leave them confused, especially if they&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tradepressed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/twitter.jpg" title="twitter.jpg"><img src="http://tradepressed.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/twitter.jpg" alt="twitter.jpg" align="left" height="180" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="298" /></a>I&#8217;ve been to the conferences and I know what the (current) Web 2.0 tools are. The obvious ones. And I agree. We should be using these tools. But how? Standing up in front of a bunch of editors and saying &#8220;Twitter,&#8221; like it&#8217;s completely self-explanatory, is just going to leave them confused, especially if they&#8217;ve never heard of it.</p>
<p>So how are you using Twitter for work? I searched Twitter for the word &#8220;magazine,&#8221; and here&#8217;s some of what I found. <a href="http://www.vermontbiz.com/">Vermont Business Magazine</a> has <a href="http://twitter.com/vermontbiz">tweets </a>that seem to link to news stories on its site. No chit chat. Just the facts. So here, Twitter seems to serve as an RSS feed for site content.</p>
<p><a href="http://punchlinemagazine.com/site/">Punchline Magazine </a>has a Twitter account that&#8217;s a lot more chatty, like a <a href="http://twitter.com/punchlinemag">personal Twitter</a>. It also links back to site content, including video interviews.  Punchline has 75 followers on Twitter, and the interaction with the editor(s) is really good. Having a lot of loyal followers who like to talk seem to make or break a magazine&#8217;s Twitter. Otherwise, you&#8217;re just talking to yourself. Only thing - who&#8217;s tweets are these? What&#8217;s your name, Punchline tweeter?</p>
<p>I thought this was really cool - <a href="http://www.craftzine.com/">Craft magazine</a> uses Twitter as a <a href="http://twitter.com/craft">repository for How To</a> tips. This seems perfect for Twitter. I get a quick list of story headlines (<span class="entry-content"><a href="http://blog.craftzine.com/archive/2008/08/how_to_recycle_old_crayons.html?CMP=OTC-5JF307375954">HOW TO - Recycle Old Crayons</a>) delivered to me, and I decide which are interesting enough to click. And these aren&#8217;t all full-blown articles. Some are quick blog posts. </span></p>
<p>Are you using a Twitter feed on your site or linking to a magazine Twitter page? What&#8217;s the theory behind yours? Letting readers get to know you a little better? Promote good content? Just messing around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/08/07/whats-twitter-really-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great interview questions for feature stories</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/04/05/great-interview-questions-for-feature-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/04/05/great-interview-questions-for-feature-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/2008/04/05/great-interview-questions-for-feature-stories/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We interview a lot of people, but unlike some newspaper reporting, the profile feature article needs to get to the core of the story subject &#8212; find out what makes a business owner tick. Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you could just ask, &#8220;What makes you tick?&#8221; And the subject went on for 20 minutes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We interview a lot of people, but unlike some newspaper reporting, the profile feature article needs to get to the core of the story subject &#8212; find out what makes a business owner tick. Wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you could just ask, &#8220;What makes you tick?&#8221; And the subject went on for 20 minutes on what makes him/her really article-worthy?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t happen. So what do you ask to really get the good stuff? I just heard a good one &#8212; What two or three things about your business really keep you up at night? What&#8217;s your favorite interview question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/04/05/great-interview-questions-for-feature-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it who or whom?</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/is-it-who-or-whom/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/is-it-who-or-whom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AP Stylebook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grammar Girl]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Grammar Day]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/is-it-who-or-whom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m upset that I missed National Grammar Day (isn&#8217;t every day Grammar Day?), but I still want to talk about Grammar Girl&#8217;s post on Top Ten Grammar Myths. My first reaction is that endorsing the split infinitive and ending sentences in prepositions is a travesty, but her arguments are too good. With the advent of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m upset that I missed <a href="http://nationalgrammarday.com/" target="_blank">National Grammar Day</a> (isn&#8217;t every day Grammar Day?), but I still want to talk about <a href="http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/top-ten-grammar-myths.aspx" target="_blank">Grammar Girl&#8217;s post on Top Ten Grammar Myths</a>. My first reaction is that endorsing the split infinitive and ending sentences in prepositions is a travesty, but her arguments are too good. With the advent of user-generated content, isn&#8217;t it time print journalism just started talking the same way our readers do?</p>
<p>No matter what the AP Stylebook says, there are people out there who think &#8220;whom&#8221; is a made up word. <a href="http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/episodes.shtml#vid=169097&amp;tin=1247.187&amp;tou=1313.564&amp;plt=lf" target="_blank">Like Creed on <em>The Office</em></a> (after an ad, gotta pay the bills).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/is-it-who-or-whom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics in journalism 2.0 &#8212; impossible?</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/ethics-in-journalism-20-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/ethics-in-journalism-20-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ASBPE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/ethics-in-journalism-20-impossible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been obsessed with one topic the last few weeks and I&#8217;ve been trying to think of a more professional way to talk about it than just arrrrgggggggghhhhhhh! I guess I failed. Ethics.
ROP pages are down, everybody knows it. At my company, it feels like we&#8217;re finally satisfied that this isn&#8217;t just a &#8220;market fluctuation&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been obsessed with one topic the last few weeks and I&#8217;ve been trying to think of a more professional way to talk about it than just arrrrgggggggghhhhhhh! I guess I failed. Ethics.</p>
<p>ROP pages are down, everybody knows it. At my company, it feels like we&#8217;re finally satisfied that this isn&#8217;t just a &#8220;market fluctuation&#8221; and new types of ad programs are being formulated. Great! Maybe.</p>
<p>I thought these packages would focus on the Web and Internet projects &#8212; cool ways to get more information and more types of information to more people. It&#8217;s not going that way, though. We&#8217;re entering the golden age of the advertorial. Barf. The days of separation of church and state are gone.</p>
<p>So, dear reader, on a scale of 1 to 10, how much does your company follow the <a href="http://www.asbpe.org/about/code.htm">ASBPE Code of Ethics</a> or similar? There has to be a way for my magazine to make money and for me to keep my ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/03/08/ethics-in-journalism-20-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video on a magazine&#8217;s website</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/02/05/video-on-a-magazines-website/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/02/05/video-on-a-magazines-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The push to Web 2.0 is on everywhere, and at our company, a lot of people are hot for Web video. Everyone wants to design pages to accommodate video, we have people hunting down video applications, but not many people are stopping to ask where all these videos are going to come from.
Personally, and I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The push to Web 2.0 is on everywhere, and at our company, a lot of people are hot for Web video. Everyone wants to design pages to accommodate video, we have people hunting down video applications, but not many people are stopping to ask where all these videos are going to come from.</p>
<p>Personally, and I hope my opinion does change someday, I&#8217;m not too hot for video. We&#8217;re having enough trouble meeting quotas for copy. I don&#8217;t think readers want to tune in to hear me drone on about something just to meet some Web standard. Plus, I don&#8217;t want to be on camera.</p>
<p>Sure, we could interview people/readers for our Web video, but our company isn&#8217;t set up with the budget, personnel or training for this type of work.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t watch too much online video, anyway. I find video players have compatibility issues about 60 percent of the time. I&#8217;d much rather just read than have to watch. Unless it&#8217;s the talking baby commercial from Super Bowl Sunday.</p>
<p><object class="embed" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/3kUGmG_EOUc"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3kUGmG_EOUc" /><em>You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video</em></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/02/05/video-on-a-magazines-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 reasons being a trade press editor is awesome</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/28/top-10-reasons-being-a-trade-press-editor-is-awesome/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/28/top-10-reasons-being-a-trade-press-editor-is-awesome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[the writer's life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[career advice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[swag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s how introductions to new people go for me: Someone asks me what I do for a living. I say I&#8217;m a magazine editor. The person&#8217;s face lights up and a broad smile spreads.
&#8220;Oh really? What magazine?&#8221;
&#8220;It&#8217;s a trade magazine called &#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;ve already lost my audience. How about a little respect? My job is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how introductions to new people go for me: Someone asks me what I do for a living. I say I&#8217;m a magazine editor. The person&#8217;s face lights up and a broad smile spreads.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh really? What magazine?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a trade magazine called &#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;ve already lost my audience. How about a little respect? My job is important, after all! Over the holidays, for the first time ever another person asked me for career advice. She&#8217;s 28, studied art in Europe for years and is now looking for a job &#8212; writing. From the look on her face, you&#8217;d think I killed her puppy when I told her the best game in town is the trade press (OK, so this isn&#8217;t exactly New York).</p>
<p>And this week, the scariest prospect of all is upon me: career day. So to prepare myself, I&#8217;ve composed the top 10 reasons trade press is awesome:</p>
<p><strong>10. No math. </strong>Well, some math. But no math for math&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p><strong>9. Free coffee.</strong> Maybe this isn&#8217;t an exclusive to the trade press, but it&#8217;s good.</p>
<p><strong>8. Free travel.</strong> I&#8217;ve seen so much stuff I never would have without the trade press.</p>
<p><strong>7. Free swag.</strong> Pens, notepads, coffee cups, t-shirts and the occasional gym bag.</p>
<p><strong>6. Monthly deadlines. </strong>Or weekly. Better than daily. Which reminds me &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>5. No city council meetings. </strong>No explanation necessary.</p>
<p><strong>4. Fame beyond your wildest dreams.</strong> In the industry, anyway. I&#8217;m a semi-celebrity. Especially during the aforementioned travel.</p>
<p><strong>3.  Stet. </strong>Does the average person know what it means? No. Do I? Yes. It&#8217;s like a secret society.</p>
<p><strong>2.</strong>  Being around <strong>other people who laugh at bad grammar</strong>, too.  And who also have an addiction to good pens. See #7.</p>
<p><strong>1. Full-time writing job.</strong> You can&#8217;t really argue about this one. It is pretty nice to be making money for putting pen to paper</p>
<p>And there are millions, millions more reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/28/top-10-reasons-being-a-trade-press-editor-is-awesome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Winning the awards &#8212; Somebody tell me how it&#8217;s done</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/22/winning-the-awards-somebody-tell-me-how-its-done/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/22/winning-the-awards-somebody-tell-me-how-its-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[the writer's life]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s awards time, everywhere from Hollywood to Trade Pressland. Seeing the Oscar nominees, in all their controversy, has me thinking &#8212; What does it take to win?
Movie critics, who do nothing but watch and rate movies all day, can&#8217;t even predict what will happen with Oscar nominations. How am I to know what kinds of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s awards time, everywhere from Hollywood to Trade Pressland. Seeing the Oscar nominees, in all their controversy, has me thinking &#8212; What does it take to win?</p>
<p>Movie critics, who do nothing but watch and rate movies all day, can&#8217;t even predict what will happen with Oscar nominations. How am I to know what kinds of articles trade press judges are going to like? Without knowing an industry, how can you judge how valuable new information is to an audience? And the comparison between industries seems a little apples to oranges to me.</p>
<p>What wins? Humor? Levity? Hard-hitting news? Analysis? I still haven&#8217;t figured it out. I have to win something sooner or later. Anyone have any advice for me? My ego is aching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/22/winning-the-awards-somebody-tell-me-how-its-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Brady - Rebel Without A Contents Page</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/15/folio-the-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/15/folio-the-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[layout]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Brady may have lost his mind. In this month&#8217;s Folio:, he suggests dropping page numbers. Actually, it&#8217;s not that bad an idea &#8212; save some editorial space on the TOC and a little bit of time at the end of production. I can just imagine trying to pitch that idea, though. &#8220;But we&#8217;ve been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Brady may have lost his mind. In this month&#8217;s Folio:, he suggests dropping page numbers. Actually, it&#8217;s not that bad an idea &#8212; save some editorial space on the TOC and a little bit of time at the end of production. I can just imagine trying to pitch that idea, though. &#8220;But we&#8217;ve been doing it this way for so long&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Other things I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing go away:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Advertiser index. </strong>I just don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s how readers use magazines. Am I wrong?</li>
<li><strong>Reader service numbers.</strong> Are we the only ones who still use them? If a reader wants more information, they&#8217;ll either go to our website or Google.</li>
<li><strong>The upfront news section.</strong> You&#8217;ve already heard it by the time the magazine hits your desk. I can just about guarantee it. If we need to elaborate, it should be a feature.</li>
<li>Every ad&#8217;s request for <strong>far forward, right hand page</strong>. C&#8217;mon. Really?</li>
<li><strong>Cover blurbs.</strong> I know they&#8217;re important. I just can&#8217;t write them.</li>
<li><strong>The four-column page.</strong> Every line is hyphenated and I think for regular features it looks bad overall. It can sometimes work for special features/sections, though.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/15/folio-the-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update Your Image&#8230;Golf Digest Did It For Golf</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/13/update-your-imagegolf-digest-did-it-for-golf/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/13/update-your-imagegolf-digest-did-it-for-golf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Golf – it is the downfall of my career. I hate it, so I’ll never be an executive. I’ve made my peace with it.
But I accidentally came across an issue of Golf Digest today. I wasn’t reading it, I was checking to see what they do with their back page and TOC. And it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Golf – it is the downfall of my career. I hate it, so I’ll never be an executive. I’ve made my peace with it.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">But I accidentally came across an issue of <em>Golf Digest</em> today. I wasn’t reading it, I was checking to see what they do with their back page and TOC. And it was rockin. The design is really clean, with sharp, modern-looking tabheads and graphics. Mr. Style’s <a href="http://www.golfdigest.com/magazine/mrstyle/2008/01/yearinreview">take on the year in golf</a>, with Borat!  It reads like <em>Men’s Health</em>.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">So why are broadcasts of golf matches (games, rounds, whatever) still so boring? Lame elevator music playing in and out of commercials? Tired graphics&#8230;.etc.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">Are trade magazines the golf broadcasts of publishing? People who read <em>Men’s Health</em> and <em>Golf Digest</em> also read our magazines. But, in my experience, we don’t feel we can compete. Why not? Because we’re not on the newsstand? I’ve heard the comment many times that we don’t want to look “too commercial.” Why not? What does commercial mean, anyway? Does it mean it has an attractive cover concept? That seems pretty important to any magazine. If it’s not on a newsstand, it’s on a desk with 50 other trade magazines. Just not on a rack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/13/update-your-imagegolf-digest-did-it-for-golf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Won&#8217;t learn the Web? You&#8217;re fired.</title>
		<link>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/08/wont-learn-the-web-youre-fired/</link>
		<comments>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/08/wont-learn-the-web-youre-fired/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tradepressed</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ASBPE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tradepressed.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received my copy of ASBPE&#8217;s Editor&#8217;s Notes newsletter (requires login) in the mail today. Jeremy Greenfield, editor of min&#8217;s b2b is hilarious:
&#8220;I personally don&#8217;t like working with people who get paid a lot and do very little,&#8221; he is quoted in the newsletter. &#8220;Promote your superstar editors and fire the rest.&#8221; Actually, I guess [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received my copy of ASBPE&#8217;s <a href="http://www.asbpe.org/asbpeCF/download.cfm?dfile=archives_members_only\2008\01-02-2008-newsletter.pdf">Editor&#8217;s Notes newsletter</a> (requires login) in the mail today. Jeremy Greenfield, editor of min&#8217;s b2b is hilarious:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I personally don&#8217;t like working with people who get paid a lot and do very little,&#8221; he is quoted in the newsletter. &#8220;Promote your superstar editors and fire the rest.&#8221; Actually, I guess it&#8217;s not so much hilarious as sad. I think we all see this problem sometimes.</p></blockquote>
<p>I like the culture change <a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=135413">Howard Owens</a> is quoted talking about on Poynter Online:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Reporters and editors would take seriously their roles as community conversation leaders, concentrating on getting it right on the web first &#8212; Web-first publishing, blogs, video, participation &#8212; and using the print edition as a greatest hits, promote the web site vehicle. Old packaged-goods-thinking about the newsPAPER would disappear overnight.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a huge change and I&#8217;m sure a lot of people out there don&#8217;t want to do the homework. Editors need to experiment to find out how things work. And I think it&#8217;s critical that they use at least Web basics in their own lives.</p>
<p>So to expand on Jeremy&#8217;s thought, here&#8217;s my list of things every editor should know how to do to avoid being fired:</p>
<ul>
<li>Use an RSS reader</li>
<li>Blog</li>
<li>Get stuff posted on your magazine&#8217;s Web site, whether you do it personally or not</li>
<li>Take a picture with your camera phone</li>
<li>Send a text message</li>
<li>Set up Google Alerts</li>
<li>Send a meeting request in Outlook</li>
</ul>
<p>Have any to add?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tradepressed.com/2008/01/08/wont-learn-the-web-youre-fired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
